You are currently not signed in.

Please sign in or register.

ფორუმი Suggestion Box A separate Performance Page for Signal providers
Votes: +3
Status: New

A separate Performance Page for Signal providers

გვერდი: 1
Aug 08, 2012 04:20 pm
#1

გვერდები: 939
გაწევრიანდა: 21/04/2011

I have seen that a few users complain about autotrading service because they cannot find a trader who is in performance list but they cannot choose it as autotrader.  Currently there is a checkbox in order to see signal providers. I think it is pretty easy to use and anyone who is paying even a little attention to perfomance page can identify it. But a few users r too lazy to do a little research. So maybe a separate page of signal providers list can help. [aww].

Stick to your rules

Aug 09, 2012 03:51 pm
Sasha User

გვერდები: 836
გაწევრიანდა: 16/05/2011

I think current performance page is user friendly. There is not much need for a separate section. But maybe "autotrading" checkbox can be highlighted so that users can see it easily.

Aug 10, 2012 04:15 pm
ironical User

გვერდები: 734
გაწევრიანდა: 22/04/2011

I am also of the view that current performance page is easy to understand. One change that can make it clearer is to replace "autotrading" checkbox text with "Signal Providers".

The good or ill of a man lies within his own will. – Epictetus

Aug 18, 2012 05:17 pm
Sasha User

გვერდები: 836
გაწევრიანდა: 16/05/2011

Originally posted by ironical

I am also of the view that current performance page is easy to understand. One change that can make it clearer is to replace "autotrading" checkbox text with "Signal Providers".



Yes. Thats a good idea. Replacing autotrading with signal providers will be more informative and helpful.

Aug 21, 2012 03:46 pm
Champ User

გვერდები: 711
გაწევრიანდა: 17/05/2011

I think all performances should be on one page. Users can easily filter signal providers.

http://www.fxstat.com/widget/link?t=tiny&c=1&s=24959&o1=growth&o2=drawdown&o3=profitfactor

Sep 02, 2012 02:41 pm
illiterate User

გვერდები: 561
გაწევრიანდა: 21/04/2011

I am also of the view that just a filter is ok. Separate page is really not necessary. As other users suggested, this filter can be a little more prominent.

https://www.fxstat.com/widget/link?t=medium&c=1&s=25892&o1=growth&o2=drawdown&o3=monthly&o4=equity

Sep 08, 2012 11:46 am
Jogi User

გვერდები: 685
გაწევრიანდა: 06/06/2011

I support this idea with a little change in my mind that a link within performance page can be given to a new page of signal providers. 

http://www.fxstat.com/widget/link?t=wide&c=1&s=26883&o1=growth&o2=drawdown&o3=monthly&o4=equity

Oct 01, 2012 03:21 pm
ironical User

გვერდები: 734
გაწევრიანდა: 22/04/2011

Originally posted by Jogi

I support this idea with a little change in my mind that a link within performance page can be given to a new page of signal providers. 



Well, it will not make much different. If link is to be given within performance page then highlighting current "signal provider (autotrade)" filter is better idea. 

The good or ill of a man lies within his own will. – Epictetus

Nov 07, 2012 01:32 pm

გვერდები: 939
გაწევრიანდა: 21/04/2011

Thankyou for supporing my suggestion. Please click the like button whenever u like a suggestion[erm][erm]

Stick to your rules

გვერდი: 1