Supporting some new platforms
مشاركات: 114
اشترك في: 11/01/2011
Like TradeStation, NinjaTrader, Dukascopy's JForex, and some others. Maybe it's not possible to support these platforms (even with a bridge), because if it would, the other auditors would have surely introduced before.
I am curious.
Keep it simple stupid
مشاركات: 939
اشترك في: 21/04/2011
Yes it would be nice if more platforms are supported. I think fxstat is continuously adding new brokers.
Stick to your rules
مشاركات: 513
اشترك في: 08/02/2011
one vote from my site also for this thread
http://www.xynafx.com/ Xynafx ... fund managers and forex signal service providers Minimum investment for our Forex managed Account service is $2k that will be managed individually in one investors account. XynaFx signals As low as $26 per Month.
مشاركات: 5
اشترك في: 24/08/2011
I also vote for Dukascopy integration.
مشاركات: 711
اشترك في: 17/05/2011
مشاركات: 158
اشترك في: 16/07/2011
Originally posted by RichdeLike TradeStation, NinjaTrader, Dukascopy's JForex, and some others. Maybe it's not possible to support these platforms (even with a bridge), because if it would, the other auditors would have surely introduced before.
I am curious.
FXStat does support Trading Station via the FTP uploader.
مشاركات: 734
اشترك في: 22/04/2011
I support this suggestion. +1 vote.
The good or ill of a man lies within his own will. – Epictetus
مشاركات: 1
اشترك في: 30/12/2013
If fxstat.com site provides me with protocol description I can make jForex trades uploader which will upload trades
مشاركات: 561
اشترك في: 21/04/2011
Originally posted by RichdeLike TradeStation, NinjaTrader, Dukascopy's JForex, and some others. Maybe it's not possible to support these platforms (even with a bridge), because if it would, the other auditors would have surely introduced before.
I am curious.
Actually mt4 is widely used platform so most signal providers prefer mt4. Having more platforms would be better but I think almost all professional traders do have mt4 account.